Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 31-34, January 2008

Developing the “Why” Facet of Medical Professionalism

  • Hideki Nomura

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Hideki Nomura, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kanazawa, University Hospital, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Ishikawa, Japan

Received 10 August 2007; accepted 16 October 2007.

Article Outline

Numerous articles have been published that discuss medical professionalism from the perspective of “what-to-be” and “what-to-do”. In this paradigm, for doctors to effectively execute the “right” attitudes and behaviors, they must incorporate a “know-how” attitude or “reflective practice” into their professional lives. However, definitions of “what” change over time in an evolving social context. For physicians to be able to continue incorporating the right new attitudes and behaviors, they must also develop a “know-why” perspective. The health care market follows the criteria of a “market for lemons”. The high degree of information asymmetry seen in health care is a strong risk factor for adverse selection, producing an excess of defective articles of commerce in the market. In this case, the processes of signaling and screening, two known solutions for adverse selection in general, cannot bridge the information gap between patients and doctors, since patients must put their lives and their privacy into doctors' hands. Professionalism, therefore, is used by doctors to win the trust of patients, their caregivers and society at large. This is the “why”-level intellect, in which the physician sets developing public trust as a goal for his own self-actualization and develops it in conjunction with altruism. This is a key to success for the physician as a doctor and as a person.

Key Words:  adverse selection , information asymmetry , professionalism , reflective practice , signaling

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. ABIM Foundation  , American Board of Internal Medicine  , ACP-ASIM Foundation  . American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine; European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter . Ann Intern Med . 2002;136:243–246
  2. Quinn JB , Anderson P , Finkelstein S . Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best . Harvard Bus Rev . 1996;74:71–80
  3. Schon DA . The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action . New York: Basic Books; 1983;
  4. Harden RM , Crosby JR , Davis MH , Friedman M . AMEE guide no. 14: outcome based education; part 5–from competency to meta-competency: a model for the specification of learning outcomes . Med Teacher . 1999;21:546–552
  5. Akerlof GA . The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism . Quart J Econ . 1970;84:488–500
  6. Cruess SR , Johnston S , Cruess RL . Professionalism for medicine: opportunities and obligations . Med J Aust . 2002;177:208–211
  7. A Hastings Center Project Report  . The goals of medicine: setting new priorities . Hastings Center Report . 1996;26:S1–27
  8. Swick HM . Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism . Acad Med . 2000;75:612–616
  9. Royal College of Physicians  . Doctors in Society: Medical Professionalism in a Changing World. Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians of London . London: RCP; 2005;

PII: S1607-551X(08)70070-6

doi:10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70070-6

Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 31-34, January 2008

Article Tools