Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities
Article Outline
Health care is fallible and prone to diagnostic and management errors. The major categories of diagnostic errors include: (1) no-fault errors—the disease is present but not detected; (2) system errors—a diagnosis is delayed or missed because of the imperfection in the health care system; and (3) cognitive errors—a misdiagnosis from faulty data collection or interpretation, flawed reasoning, or incomplete knowledge. Approximately one third of patient problems are mismanaged because of diagnostic errors. Part of the solution lies in improving the diagnostic skills and critical thinking abilities of physicians as they progress through medical school and residency training. However, this task is challenging since both medical problem-solving and the learning environments are complex and not easily understood. There are many interacting variables including the motivation of the medical student (e.g. deep versus surface learning), the acquisition and evolution of declarative and conditional knowledge (e.g. reduced, dispersed, elaborated, scheme, and scripted), problem-solving strategies (e.g. procedural knowledge—guessing, hypothetical deductive, scheme inductive, and pattern recognition), curricular models (e.g. apprenticeship, discipline-based, body system-based, case-based, clinical presentation-based), teaching strategies (e.g. teaching general to specific or specific to general), the presented learning opportunities (PBL versus scheme inductive PBL), and the nature of the learning environment (e.g. modeling critical thinking and expert problem-solving). This paper elaborates on how novices differ from experts and how novices can be educated in a manner that enhances their level of expertise and diagnostic abilities as they progress through several years of medical training.
Key Words: critical thinking , curriculum design , expertise acquisition , medical cognition , medical problem-solving
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . How to build a student for the 21st century . TIME Magazine . December 18, 2006;
- Paul R, Elder L, Bartell T. Taken from the California Teacher Preparation for Instruction in Critical Thinking: Research Findings and Policy Recommendations. State of California, California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, Sacramento, CA, March 1997.
- . The relationship of self-efficacy, motivation, and critical thinking disposition to achievement and attitudes when an illustrated web lecture is used in an online learning environment . J Agric Educ . 2005;46:12–23
- . Defining Critical Thinking . Available at: http://www.criticalthinking.org/page.cfm?PageID=766&CategoryID=51 [Date accessed: January 9, 2008]
- The Critical Thinking Community homepage . Available at: http://www.criticalthinking.org [Date accessed: January 1, 2008]
- Answers.com definition of critical thinking. Available at: http://www.answers.com/topic/critical-thinking [Date accessed: January 1, 2008]
- . Evidence-based Practice: Logic and Critical Thinking in Medicine . Chicago: AMA Press; 2004;
- . Improving Learning: New Perspectives . London: Kogan Page; 1988;
- . Cognitive psychology and medical diagnosis . Appl Cogn Psychol . 1990;4:261–262
- Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning . Science Technology Human Values . 1978;3:50–51
- Scripts and clinical reasoning . Med Educ . 2007;41:1178–1184
- . Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking . Acad Med . 1994;69:883–885
- . A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication . Acad Med . 1990;65:611–621
- Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success . Med Educ . 2003;37:695–703
- Expert-type knowledge structure in medical students is associated with increased odds of diagnostic success . Teach Learn Med . 2007;19:35–41
- . Medical curriculum reform in North America, 1765 to the present: a cognitive science perspective . Acad Med . 1999;74:154–164
- . Many professors now start at the beginning by teaching their students how to think . Chronicle of Higher Education . March 5, 1986;23–25
- . Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry based teaching . Educ Psychol . 2006;41:75–86
- Helping students learn to think like experts when solving clinical problems . Acad Med . 1997;72:173–179
- . The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of logical operations and social studies concepts . Am Educ Res J . 1977;14:25–43
PII: S1607-551X(08)70131-1
doi:10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70131-1
© 2008 Elsevier. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
