Comparison of Automated 4D-MSPECT and Visual Analysis for Evaluating Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease
Article Outline
The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic performance for coronary artery disease (CAD) of an automated software package, 4D-MSPECT, and compare the results with a visual approach. We enrolled 60 patients without previously known CAD, who underwent dual-isotope rest Tl-201/stress Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging and subsequent coronary angiography within 3 months. The automated summed stress score (A-SSS), summed rest score (A-SRS) and summed difference score (A-SDS) were obtained using a 17-segment five-point scale model with 4D-MSPECT. For intraobserver and interobserver variability assessment, automated scoring was done by a nuclear medicine physician twice and by a nuclear medicine technologist. The visual summed stress score (V-SSS), summed rest score (V-SRS), and summed difference score (V-SDS) were obtained by consensus of two nuclear medicine physicians. The intraobserver and interobserver agreements of automated segmental scores were excellent. The intraobserver and interobserver summed scores also correlated well. Agreements between visual and automated segmental scores were moderate (weighted κ of 0.55 and 0.50 for stress and rest images, respectively). Correlations between automated and visual summed scores were high, with correlation coefficients of 0.89, 0.85 and 0.82 for SSS, SRS and SDS, respectively (all p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for diagnosis of CAD by V-SSS, V-SDS, A-SSS and A-SDS were 0.78 ± 0.06, 0.87 ± 0.05, 0.84 ± 0.05 and 0.90 ± 0.04, respectively. A-SDS had better diagnostic performance than A-SSS and V-SSS (p = 0.043 and p = 0.032, respectively), whereas there was no statistically significant difference between A-SDS and V-SDS (p = 0.56). Using V-SDS ≥ 2 as a diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CAD were 83.7%, 76.5% and 81.7%, respectively. Using A-SDS ≥ 3 as a diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CAD were 79.1%, 82.4% and 80.0%, respectively. In conclusion, the reproducibility of automated semiquantitative analysis with 4D-MSPECT was excellent. The diagnostic performance of automated semiquantitative analysis with 4D-MSPECT was comparable with the visual approach.
Key Words: automated semiquantitative scoring , coronary artery disease , 4D-MSPECT , myocardial perfusion imaging , visual semiquantitative scoring
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2004;31:261–291
- Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion singlephoton emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study . J Am Coll Cardiol . 1993;22:1455–1464
- Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart . Circulation . 2002;105:539–542
- Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation . J Nucl Cardiol . 2004;11:414–423
- Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography . J Nucl Cardiol . 2007;14:e39–e60
- Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification . Circulation . 1996;93:905–914
- Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography . J Am Coll Cardiol . 1998;32:1987–1995
- Longterm outcome of patients with silent versus symptomatic ischemia six months after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting . J Am Coll Cardiol . 2003;42:33–40
- Prevalence of symptomatic and silent stress-induced perfusion defects in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2005;32:60–69
- Incremental prognostic power of single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease . Am J Cardiol . 2005;95:182–188
- A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: technical principles and reproducibility . J Nucl Med . 2000;41:712–719
- A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. II: validation and diagnostic yield . J Nucl Med . 2000;41:720–727
- The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach . J Nucl Cardiol . 2007;14:420–432
- Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach . J Nucl Cardiol . 2007;14:433–454
- Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology . J Nucl Cardiol . 2007;14:455–465
- Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits . J Nucl Cardiol . 2005;12:66–77
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages . J Nucl Cardiol . 2008;15:27–34
- . Quantification of myocardial perfusion defects using three different software packages . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging . 2004;31:229–232
- Automated quantification of Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion compared with visual analysis . Nucl Med Commun . 2004;25:833–838
- A normal stress SPECT scan is an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography . J Nucl Cardiol . 2007;14:187–193
PII: S1607-551X(09)70001-4
doi:10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70001-4
© 2008 Elsevier. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
