Setting Pass Scores for Clinical Skills Assessment
Article Outline
In a clinical skills assessment, the decision to pass or fail an examinee should be based on the test content or on the examinees' performance. The process of deciding a pass score is known as setting a standard of the examination. This requires a properly selected panel of expert judges and a suitable standard setting method, which best fits the purpose of the examination. Six standard setting methods that are often used in clinical skills assessment are described to provide an overview of the standard setting process.
Key Words: clinical skills assessment , standard setting
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . Assess clinical competence—an overview . Med Teach . 1979;1:289–296
- . Passing Scores: A Manual for Setting Standards of Performance on Educational and Occupational Tests . Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service; 1982;
- . Choosing between examinee-centered and test-centered standard-setting methods . Educ Assess . 1998;5:129–145
- . Designing and evaluating standard-setting procedures for licensure and certification tests . Adv Health Sci Educ . 1999;4:195–207
- . Setting standards on educational tests . Med Educ . 2003;37:464–469
- . Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education . Teach Learn Med . 2006;18:50–57
- . Constructing Written Test Questions for the Basic and Clinical Sciences . Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2001;
- . Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations . Med Teach . 2003;25:245–249
- . What is … Normative versus criterionreferenced assessment . Med Teach . 1989;11:145–150
- . Formative and summative assessment . In: Dent JA , Harden RM editor. Practical Guide for Medical Teachers . 1st edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2001;p. 293–302
- . Establishing passing standards for classroom achievement tests in medical education: a comparative study of four methods . Acad Med . 2003;78:S85–S87
- . AMEE Guide No. 18: Standard setting in student assessment . Med Teach . 2000;22:120–130
- . Setting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff method . Acad Med . 2008;83:S13–S16
- . The effect of incorporating normative data into a criterion-referenced standard setting in medical education . Acad Med . 2003;78:S88–S90
- . An NCME instructional module on: setting passing scores . Educ Meas: Issues Pract . 1996;15:20–31
- . Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method . Adv Health Sci Educ . 2006;11:115–122
- Comparison of a rational and an empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE . Med Educ . 2003;37:132–139
- Setting a standard for performance assessment of doctor-patient communication in general practice . Med Educ . 2004;38:1244–1252
- . Theories of assessment methods in OSCE . In: Otaki J editors. Theories and Practices of OSCE . Tokyo: Shinohara-shuppan Shinsha; 2007;p. 18–39 [In Japanese]
- . Using borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schools . Med Educ . 2007;41:1024–1031
- Hambleton RK. Setting Standard on Performance Assessments: Promising New Methods and Technical Issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, August 1995. Available from http://eric.ed.gov/ [Date accessed: November 20, 2008]
- . The credibility and comparability of standards . Appl Meas Educ . 1997;10:39–59
- . Standard setting: a comparison of case-author and modified borderline-group methods in a small-scale OSCE . Acad Med . 2002;77:729–732
- . Defining competency—the role of standard setting . Med Educ . 2000;34:363–366
PII: S1607-551X(09)70032-4
doi:10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70032-4
© 2008 Elsevier. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
